Which is better: Cleverpanda i5, iClebo Omega or iRobot Roomba 980?


If you compare Cleverpanda i5, iRobot Roomba 980 And iClebo Omega Compared to models from other manufacturers, their technical specifications and features, we can conclude that these are among the best robot vacuums of 2017-2018. Many people find it difficult to choose between these robots. While Cleverpanda is not everyone's favorite, it's very difficult to determine which model is better between the Roomba 980 and the Omega. Below, we'll compare the Cleverpanda, iClebo, and iRobot robot vacuums, helping you decide which is best for your apartment or home.
Comparison table
To compare the technical specifications of the Cleverpanda i5, iRobot Roomba 980, and iClebo Omega robot vacuum cleaners and choose the best one, use the table below, which presents the key features of these robots:
| Cleverpanda i5 | iRobot Roomba 980 | iClebo Omega | ||
| Dimensions (WxHxD) | 34x34x6 cm | 35x35x9.1 cm | 34x35x8.7 cm | |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 4 kg | 3.1 kg | |
| Battery | Li-Pol | Li-Ion | Li-Ion | |
| Battery capacity (mAh) | 7,000 | 3,300 | 4,400 | |
| Power consumption (Watts) | 85-125 | 40 | 45 | |
| Battery life (minutes) | 140 | 120 | 80 | |
| Charging time | 180 | 180 | 180 | |
| Cleaning area (m2) | up to 240 | up to 120 | up to 100 | |
| Type of cleaning | dry and wet | dry | dry and wet | |
| Dust container volume (liters) | 0.5 | 1 | 0.65 | |
| Cyclic HEPA filter | + | + | — | |
| Noise level (dB) | 46 | 60 | 68 | |
| Autonomous return to the charging station | + | + | + | |
| Height of obstacles to be overcome (centimeters) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | |
| Camcorder | active | + | + | |
| Wet wiping of the floor | full-fledged | — | floor polisher mode | |
| Programming a cleaning schedule | + | + | + | |
| Anti-entanglement system | + | + | + | |
| Cartography and navigation | + | + | + | |
| Virtual wall | + | + | + | |
| Touch panel | + | + | + | |
| Control from a smartphone | + | + | — | |
| Wi-Fi mobile app | + | + | — | |
| Warranty period | 2 years | 1 year | 1 year | |
Analysis of characteristics
You can compare the specifications of the Cleverpanda i5, iClebo Omega, and iRobot Roomba 980 robot vacuums yourself by reviewing the data in the table and examining the comparative analysis of their features. Our subjective analysis of the technical specifications and features of the Cleverpanda, iRobot, and iClebo robot vacuums is provided below. Comparing the specifications of these models will help you make the right choice.
Price
The robot vacuums presented for comparison vary in price. The most expensive is the iRobot Roomba 980 at $540, the iClebo Omega costs $359, and the cheapest is the Cleverpanda i5 at under $200. The Cleverpanda is more affordable than both the iRobot and Roomba, and the i5 can be purchased for as little as $180 (as offered by some online retailers).
Cleaning area
One of the significant differences between the compared robot vacuums is the battery type and capacity. Cleverpanda has the most powerful battery, with a 7,000 mAh lithium-polymer battery and a cleaning area of up to 240 square meters. The iClebo's lithium-ion battery has a smaller capacity (4,400 mAh) and covers an area of 120 square meters. The iRobot's lithium-ion battery has the lowest capacity (3,300 mAh), although its maximum cleaning area also reaches 120 square meters.
Dust container volume
Comparing the models presented by this parameter, the iRobot robot has the highest capacity – 1 liter. The iClever Omega has a dust bin capacity of 0.65 liters, while the Cleverpanda has a dust bin capacity of only 0.5 liters. In this regard, the Cleverpanda is inferior, while the iRobot is significantly larger than the compared models.
Filter type
All three robot vacuums used for comparison feature the latest HEPA filters, class H-12, with triple-level filtration. These filters provide thorough cleaning and cleaner, safer air.
Noise level
In terms of "quiet operation," Cleverpanda leads the competition with a noise level of 45 dB. iClebo and iRobot have noise levels of 68 and 60 dB, respectively. These are relatively high.
Suction power
This indicator is also provided for comparison, as it is one of the most important factors in a robot vacuum's performance. Among the vacuum cleaners presented, the Cleverpanda has the highest performance, boasting a higher suction power of 125 watts (as stated by the manufacturer). Another key distinguishing feature of this model is the ability to adjust the suction power. The iClebo has a suction power of 45 watts, while the iRobot has 40 watts.
Wet cleaning function
Of the models presented for comparison, only the Cleverpanda vacuum cleaner is capable of full wet cleaning. It has a water container that wets the cleaning cloth during wet cleaning. The iClebo also has a wet mopping function, but the cleaning cloth is wetted manually. The iRobot model is designed for dry cleaning only, which is where it falls short compared to its competitors.
Driving modes
The comparison robotic vacuums have several motion modes—zigzag, serpentine, spiral, and wall-following. The ability to change the motion pattern allows the robots to clean more thoroughly, tailored to the room's features, and cover the entire area. In this regard, all robotic vacuums are equally adept at moving.
Navigation and cartography
The latest navigation and mapping technologies are a key requirement for such a highly effective robot vacuum cleaner. This feature allows it to navigate, identify heavily soiled areas, recognize previously cleaned areas, plot a cleaning route, and automatically recognize obstacles and elevation changes, avoiding them, preventing potential collisions and falls. Not all modern robots feature such cutting-edge navigation. However, all three models compared feature intelligent navigation and room mapping systems.
It's worth noting that Cleverpanda has a video camera with active recording mode, allowing the homeowner to connect to the robot at any time and see what's happening in the home in real time. In this regard, the Cleverpanda i5 manufacturers have done a great job with this convenient addition.
If you want to choose a robot with good navigation, we also recommend checking out our list of the best robotic vacuum cleaners with room mapping.
Control
Of the models compared, only iRobot and Cleverpanda offer smartphone control. Simply connecting to Wi-Fi is enough. This is where the iRobot Omega suffers its first significant drawback. For this price, the robot vacuum could have been equipped with smartphone control, not just a remote control.
Let's sum it up
All the parameters analyzed above only have a meaningful impact on one thing: the cleaning performance of a robot vacuum cleaner. After all, even if a robot runs for up to three hours without recharging, has tremendous suction power, and a large dust bin, but still fails to detect debris, leaving over 50% of the area uncleaned after cleaning, there's little point in its excellent technical specifications. And here, despite the Cleverpanda i5's many performance improvements over the iRobot Roomba 980 and iClebo Omega, its floor cleaning performance is significantly lower than that of its renowned counterparts.
Of course, you should keep in mind that it is also cheaper, but still, if you are ready to spend more than $500 on a robotic vacuum cleaner, it makes sense to pay a little more and choose between the Omega and Roomba.
Comparing the iClebo Omega and the iRobot Roomba 980, it's safe to say the Omega cleans slightly better. However, this model has inferior features (smaller dust bin, no smartphone control, etc.). But let's return to the fact that the iClebo is cheaper than the iRobot, which is no less important, as the difference of $140 is negligible in terms of features, and it also includes a wet mop function.
That's why, when choosing between the iClebo Omega and the iRobot Roomba 980, we'd choose the former. We also recommend that you watch the video, which provides a test run of the compared robots, as well as their counterparts:
The table above and the comparison analysis of Cleverpanda, iRobot, and iClebo robots will help you understand their true capabilities and make the right choice when purchasing a reliable electronic home assistant based on your needs and budget. We hope this information was helpful and helped you make your purchase decision!
It will be interesting to read:










Exactly. We were choosing between the iClebo Omega and the iRobot Roomba 980. We chose the iClebo Omega because it has a wet cleaning feature and is $140 cheaper. I don't see the point of smartphone control at all. Why would you need it if you can program the robot to start working every day at a set time? We did that with ours, and it's quite convenient.
The Cleverpanda i5 is a complete disappointment and, in my opinion, a scam on the part of the manufacturer. This robot vacuum cleaner reminds me of a children's toy, a self-propelled one. I brought one of these back from China for my child back in 2005. It just drives around the room, bumps into obstacles, and then turns around. There's no mapping!!! ((( I've used it in the room about 10 times, and every time, after about 5 minutes of poking it back and forth, it crawled into the space between the side of the sofa and the wall and couldn't get out.
I helped him with the remote control. This "robot" couldn't overcome the height of the lint-free carpet. Its wheels constantly wouldn't reach the carpet. I had to either use the remote control (by accelerating and turning the wheels) or help it with my hand.
The slightest obstacle and it starts to stall. A gap in the laminate flooring gave it a lot of trouble. The suction power is terrible. There were crumbs scattered on the carpet—I ran it back and forth about 20 times, and it still couldn't pick them up.
I won't go into detail about my disappointment. I think if it cost $50, it would be worth buying—it would be good for scaring a cat or dog when you're not home! ))) As a vacuum cleaner, it's "no good"!!!! Wi-Fi is completely unnecessary. The smartphone app has the same functions as the remote control. You won't use it. Just play with it a couple of times. The "wet cleaning" function is also unnecessary—it leaves streaks and you have to wash everything again. Or stop it every 5 minutes and rinse the cloth.
It's faster to just go over it with a mop and not wait 30 minutes for this "robot" to "sweep the dirt away." Total crap for that kind of money!!!! This probably isn't Japanese at all, but pure China.
And not the best quality. On the second day, it stopped working—the circuit board burned out. (I guess the Almighty heard my utter disappointment in this device.) And the seller promised to refund my money or exchange it for another vacuum cleaner!!! If you think I bought a fake (see YouTube) in a red box for $250... No! I bought the original in a white box for $450 (they gave me a discount). And the price on the website is $500!!!